A. Setaioli, “Interpretazioni stoiche anche epicuree per Servio di nuovo la tradizione dell’esegesi filosofica del favola di nuovo dei poeti verso Roma (Cornuto, Seneca, Filodemo)”, I–II,International Journal of the Classical Tradition 10, 2003–2004, 335–376; 11, 2004–2005, 3–46.

Per. Setaioli, “Le fragment II Soubiran duDe consulatu de Ciceron, leDe diuinatione et leur lecture par Virgile”, in:Signe et prediction dans l’Antiquite. Actes du Tete-a-tete international interdisciplinaire de Creteil et de Paris (22–23–24 niente affatto 2003) come per vedere chi si ama sul kasidie senza pagare. Textes reunis par Jose Kany-Turpin, Saint-Etienne: Publications de l’Universite de Saint-Etienne 2005, 241–261.

Ancora. Merli, “Epigrammzyklen und ‘serielle Lekture’ in den Buchern Martials: Uberlegungen und Beispiele,” sopra F

W. H. Stahl,Macrobius’ Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies 48, New York: Columbia University Press 1952 (reprint: ibid. W. H. Stahl,Macrobius’ Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies 48, New York: Columbia University Press 1990).

P. Steinmetz, “Allegorische Deutung und allegorische Dichtung durante der alten Stoa”,Rheinisches Museum fur Philologie N.F. 129, 1986, 18–30 (ristampato durante: Allo stesso modo, P. Steinmetz,Kleine Schriften, ancora. Severin Koster, Palingenesia 68, Stuttgart: Steiner 2000).

References

The ‘conferenceacta’ comprise seven papers that are meant puro document the direction(s) con which the exploration of Roman literature is now moving, or (more accurately perhaps) con the opinion of most of the contributorsshould orshould not be moving; they were published durante the most recent elenco of theTransactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 1–162 (for Edmunds, see 1–13).

Edmunds (above, n. 2):Transactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 8–9 (quotation at 8, the emphasis is mine); I leave it up sicuro the reader to discover which of the papers is excluded here. Note that Edmunds’ (and, of course, others’) elite notion of ‘interpretation’ is emphatically narrow and must not be put on per par with its ‘traditional’ sense, “esatto expound the meaning of [something]; to render (words, writings, an author, etc.) clear and explicit; esatto elucidate; to explain” (OED 2 , s.v., 1a).

Exceptions prove the rule. Whatever W.’s predisposition may have been, he surely made a wise decision when embarking onRoman Homosexuality for his Ph.D. first, andthen turning onesto a commentary on per collection of poetry.

For verso theoretic back-up, cf. D. Fowler, “Criticism as commentary and commentary as criticism sopra the age of the electronic mass media,” in: G. W. Most (di nuovo.),Commentaries-Kommentare, Aporemata 4 (Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1999): 426–442 (esp. 429–430).

Other examples of modern scholars, all well-known and highly esteemed forboth their theoryoriented works and their commentaries, include Addirittura. Fantham (Seneca, Lucan, Ovid), D. Fowler (Lucretius), and R. F. Thomas (Virgil), puro name but a few.

W., at 283–284, gives per list of the most important editions and commentaries, puro which one might want to add A. Canobbio,La lex Roscia theatralis anche Militare: il ritmo del analisi V, Scaffale di Athenaeum 49 (Como: New Press, 2002), because it is per valuable supplement onesto P. Howell’s edition of Book 5 (Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1995), for which seeAnzeiger fur die Altertums-wissenschafter 50 (1997): 17–21. The collection of essays on Book 10, edited by G. Damschen and A. Heil,maton liber decimus: Text Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late onesto be included sopra W.’s bibliography.

The bibliography, as emphasized by W. (283), is of course not meant esatto be exhaustive; for aForschungsbericht, see S. Lorenz, “]): 167–227, and cf. the bibliography durante Damschen-Heil (above, n.7):maton liber decimus: Text, Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late preciso be included sopra W.’s bibliography 401–490.

For verso useful assessment of this issue (initiated by K. Barwick), cf. Grewing (anche.),Toto notus con orbe: Perspektiven der Martial-Interpretation, Palingenesia 65, (Stuttgart: F. Steiner Verlag, 1998): 139–156.